Warning: file_exists() [function.file-exists]: open_basedir restriction in effect. File(/home/infospac/public_html/wordpress/wp-content/plugins//../../../../../../../../../../../../../../../../../tmp/sess_4eaa6211e6625b852d1d3756afe2bf47.txt) is not within the allowed path(s): (/home/infospac/:/usr/lib/php:/usr/local/lib/php:/tmp) in /home/infospac/public_html/wordpress/wp-settings.php on line 114
InfoSpaces » Blog Archive » Enterprise Wikis

Enterprise Wikis

JotSpot Screenshot

For an exciting internal project on my new company, I’m working on a little research on enterprise wikis.

There are of course some comprehensive and updated articles to select the right tool. For example the wikimatrix.

Being an advocate of usability, user centred methodologies and user experience I’m very disappointed to learn that quite all current wiki implementations don’t provide a number of really fundamental features in an enterprise scenario (at least for me).

A quick list could be:

  • strong usability and a real WYSIWYG editor
  • open source license
  • a LAMP (Linux, Apache, MySql, Php) architecture if possible
  • data stored in a well known database
  • ACL and fine grained permissions
  • a behind-the-firewall solution
  • a powerful search engine for the entire content

Well, some of these features aren’t mandatory and can vary depending on your expectations and needs. Some of them are anyway a must inside an enterprise.

Here usability is the single most important feature. Employees often perceive writing a wiki an additional time-consuming task added to their everyday activities. To get a reasonable participation we have to keep things very very simply.

On the same length, corporate users need a real WYSIWYG editor, not an editor producing fancy characters typical of a wiki sintax. This request excludes the majority of non commercial wiki systems (targeted more to developers and geeks than to average users)

In my opinion, the only options worth of being evaluated as effective Enterprise Wikis are :

All of them but Dekiwiki and Twiki are commercial solutions.

Getting quickly to the point, JotSpot is the winner for me and for a long list of reasons: great usability, good wysiwyg editor, intuitive permissions and group management, a rich set of additional applications that can be used to create a complete intranet solution and, finally, a reasonable monthly cost. Yes, JotSpot is an hosted solution (actually it is only provided as a service because the server package is no longer sold by the company) so the big drawback is that your reserved and critical information will be accessible only when you are online and with the risk of being seen by competitors. JotSpot says that they are using SSL connections and of course you can use groups and permissions, but on my personal account SSL is not present and it could be anyway not enough for large enteprises.

SocialText (Perl) and Confluence (J2EE) are good professional (and quite costly) solutions that can be used remotely as services or installed on your servers (or on appliances). SocialText has also an open source version (not very updated though). I will wait to see the new release of SocialText, promising impressive improvements on this side (Ross Mayfield published an informative SocialText 2 screencast). My impression is anyway that the simplicity and power of JotSpot is still very far.

Finally, I discovered DekiWiki from MindTouch. It’s a free and quite complete software born as a fork of MediaWiki (the software powering Wikipedia). Indexing is done with Lucene and AJAX is employed when needed.

Further Reading:

Anyone of you having other suggestions?

Update October, 31th:

From Ross in the comments: Socialtext 2.0 has been released to our hosted wiki service. The open source release, Socialtext Open 2.0, will be released to SourceForge later this week:

This is wonderful! I didn’t expected to have the open version updated to the release 2.0 in such a short time. More on Social Text 2.0 later.

From Andrea Resmini: I was wrong. Twiki has a WYSIWYG plugin. Its name is Kupu. So DekiWiki is not the only non commercial solution available and satisfying my criteria.

Google has acquired Jotspot: paying account will become completely free after the end of the current billing cycle. Google is quickly moving towards a complete online office suite, buying the best products currently on the market and adding to them their incredible vision and infrastructure. Is this the reason for suspending the server version?

Have a look at TechCrunch’s , Ross Mayfield’s and Google’s posts


In the same category:

10 Responses to “Enterprise Wikis”

  1. Ross Mayfield Says:

    Socialtext is the only solution that meets all six points on your list, especially the first one (usability, wikiwyg) with the new release.

  2. Emanuele Says:

    Hi Ross,
    as I wrote in the post I have already a scheduled meeting for the next week to see a presentation of the new release. Having seen your screencam, I expect great improvements on the usability side.

    Will the open source version be updated to the new release of Social Text?

    Cheers,
    Emanuele

  3. Scott Farquhar Says:

    Emanuele,

    Did you evaluate Confluence? It isn’t open source (although you get the source when you purchase), and isn’t LAMP. If they are must have requirements - we don’t satisfy them.

    However, we have great support for the other 4 (all for over a year now).

    Regardless of who you choose - having any wiki in your organisation will a huge benefit! Give me a yell if you want me to put you in touch with any of our customers who have implemented wikis, and they can share some tips with you.

    Cheers,
    Scott

  4. Davide Eynard Says:

    Hi Emanuele,

    First of all thank you: I’m working on an exciting project too (a semantic wiki for enterprises) and found very interesting information in your post. I had to find an open wiki I could modify and improve, so I chose only free (as in freedom) ones, but I’ve noticed that my other requirements and yours are very similar and I was happy to see there was one I missed (DekiWiki) that seems quite interesting.

    I’ve seen you’ve excluded Twiki, which after my research seemed a good product (mature, with WYSIWYG editor, revision control, ACLs, lots of plugins). So I was wondering if you just missed it or if there are good reasons to exclude it I should be aware of too. :)

    Cheers,

    Davide

  5. Emanuele Says:

    Hi Davide,
    I left out Twiki as a big number of others because the editor is not WYSIWYG. Editing a topi in Twiki you get something like this:

    —++ My Links

    * %TWIKIWEB%.ATasteOfTWiki - view a short introductory presentation on TWiki for beginners
    * %TWIKIWEB%.WelcomeGuest - starting points on TWiki
    * %TWIKIWEB%.TWikiUsersGuide - complete TWiki documentation, Quick Start to Reference
    * Sandbox.%HOMETOPIC% - try out TWiki on your own
    * Sandbox.%TOPIC%Sandbox - just for me
    *
    *

    For me WYSIWYG means having the possibility of visually editing the page. That’s what my users need (and I suggest 90% of users out there, with the remaining 10% being geeks and developers).

  6. Ross Mayfield Says:

    http://sourceforge.net/forum/forum.php?forum_id=629003

  7. Andrea Resmini Says:

    It sure looks like TWiki has WYSIWYG editing capabilities via Kupu, at list in the Wikimatrix examples. See here:

    http://www.wikimatrix.org/screenshots/screen_8_3.png

  8. Emanuele Says:

    Andrea,
    thank you for the information. Anyway I tried to find an online public demo of twiki with a working WYSIWYG editor without success.

    Can you share a link on this?

    Emanuele

  9. Andrea Resmini Says:

    Although searching the TWiki website is, well, an experience per se (and worth an article, probably), you can download the WYSIWYG plugin here

    http://twiki.org/p/pub/Plugins/WysiwygPlugin/WysiwygPlugin.zip

    and you can find the finer prints and instructions here

    http://twiki.org/cgi-bin/view/TWiki04/WysiwygPlugin

    This should be enough to get you started. What I can add is that the Kupu editor [http://kupu.oscom.org] is a neat piece of software and one of our pet project up there at OSCOM.

  10. ErikC Says:

    Clearly, nothing touches MindTouch’s DekiWiki with respect to usability, extensibility, and interoperability. For more information take a look at www.OpenGarden.org and dig into the documentation; especially the many many pages on Dream. It will very quickly become clear who is and will continue to dominate this space. The product and source code speaks for itself. Cheers!

Leave a Reply