Hierarchial Tagging for Wikipedia?

consumerpedia logo
Well I’m not going to talk specifically about Wikipedia, but this topic could be of interest for its evolution as well. That’s why:

Consumerpedia aims to be a sort of Wikipedia clone in the consumer space with a page for each topic, rated comments and navigation suggestions to other related topics.

From what I can see the amount of information is very low. Finding out a populated topic is a major task, but it is a quite new experiment.

What’s interesting from my point of view is anyway their way to dynamically organize the topics without a predetermined hierarchy of categories:

Consumerpedia has no built in category hierarchy, but rather uses a unique user-driven hierarchical tagging system. This lets users create and define the relationships between different topics, helping others easily discover and browse related information.

What kind of structure is allowed? Easily said:

  • Categories: you can specify a topic for each page
  • Sub Categories: you can specify a category that is a sub-topic of already existing topic. You are creating a hierarchy here
  • Related Topics: a symmetrical relationships of relevance between topics
  • Topic Redirection: used in misspelling cases to create an alias for the preferred term

There is not a global navigation tool: each page can be reached only through the search engine (and I’m very skeptic about this approach because the information scent is completely absent here and users are blindly typing keywords).

Hierarchical tagging is one of the Facetag foundations so I’m pretty curious to see to which extent users will add this structure in Consumerpedia.

Back to the initial statement: I’m sure that this approach could work in Wikipedia where the user base is large and the motivations to participate very strong. There is anyway a main trend stating that this way to proceed is too complex for average users and that structure won’t never be systematically introduced into collaborative systems.

Let’s see but I got some infos saying that Marti Hearst (you know the Flamenco project from Berkeley) is working on a faceted approach over user generated tags..


In the same category:

4 Responses to “Hierarchial Tagging for Wikipedia?”

  1. Katherine Bertolucci Says:

    Thanks for alerting me to Consumerpedia. In return, I’ll alert you that that Berkeley is spelled with two e’s. You’re forgiven since you live in Italy. But this does illustrate one of the issues with tagging.

  2. Emanuele Says:

    Sorry, it was a typo. I have to start reviewing my posts before publishing them :)

  3. Katherine Bertolucci Says:

    Well, I managed to get a double “that” in my post and I did review it before posting.

    I am interested in the importance of spelling in online retrieval. It’s one thing to use creative spelling in an IM message, but if you get creative with somebody else’s URL, you won’t find the page. So spelling is perhaps more important now than in previous generations.

  4. Noe Says:

    So I want to know does any body else use wikipedia and what for?
    what was the most informatibve artical you found there?
    What was the wierdest one you found?
    I use wikipedia mostly durring my lunch time at work to just read up on stuff. the most informative artical I found was on the mineing and refineing
    process for copper (because I learned about the job I have, and got to show off to co-workers ;p) the most interesting was probably on cheese witch I
    actualy e-mailed to my self so I could finish reading it after work.
    oh well, got wiki?

Leave a Reply